Monday Morning (at) the Wakefield Doctrine (“…like that Rosetta Stone thing on TV, ‘cept more useful and way more fun!”) | the Wakefield Doctrine Monday Morning (at) the Wakefield Doctrine (“…like that Rosetta Stone thing on TV, ‘cept more useful and way more fun!”) | the Wakefield Doctrine

Monday Morning (at) the Wakefield Doctrine (“…like that Rosetta Stone thing on TV, ‘cept more useful and way more fun!”)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

853px-Francesco_Primaticcio_-_Ulysses_and_Penelope_-_WGA18409

The Wakefield Doctrine is a personality theory, it is a unique, useful and fun way to look at the behavior of the people in our lives. With an understanding of the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine you need no longer find yourself saying, “Why on earth would they say a thing like that? I really thought I knew them better than that!” This ‘Doctrine’ maintains that we all live our lives in  personal realities (what we refer to as ‘worldviews’). This is not an overly exotic notion, nothing too metaphysical. All of you out there reading this sees the same world, a world where…

…where the supermarkets have big plate glass windows, the parking lots are full of new-car-paint-scraping-carts; that the world is full of a variety of people in an incredibly diverse range of occupations, with the teachers, the nurses, the hookers in the bad part of town, the politicians in the wealthy part of town, and socially we all see the same associations, the boss out to get ahead, the co-workers who refuse to say anything about the bruises on the new worker, the friends our children make at school, the rejection that happens in our mind on Friday while trying to hope for salvation on Saturday night, and in a very personal way we all share the world of hoping to meet the expectations of our parents, trying to endure the pain of seeing them in a nursing home, we hear the ‘why-didn’t-you-say-something-before’ from our spouse in bed late at night, we bear up under the terrible/wonderful experience of helping our pets at the end of their lives, while at some time in the course of this very Summer we will smile and we will frown at the predictable behavior of our husbands at the annual family cookout…

…the world in common is the same for all of us. What the Wakefield Doctrine focuses on, and where our personal reality becomes personal, is that for all of the above common things, people and situations, the important thing is ‘how do we relate ourselves to them, to these parts of life’?  It is how what we think we know about/how we tend to respond to/how we feel about these (and every other of the tiny little aspects of life) that the Wakefield Doctrine is about.

The Wakefield Doctrine maintains that we all have the capacity to experience life in one of three characteristic worldviews (these personal realities we just mentioned). At a very early age we ‘pick one’ and that is the world we grow up and develop in: the reality of the Outsider (clarks), the life of the Predator (scotts) or the world of the Herd (rogers). When you know the characteristics of these three personal realities, you will be able to recognize the three personality types. When you recognize the three personality types, you will know more about the other person than they know about themselves. When you understand the nature of these three worldviews and recognise your own predominant worldview (your personality type), you will have new ways to change the things about yourself that you have always wanted to change but have been unable to change (or have changed for a while…).
It is a principle of the Wakefield Doctrine that we all have one predominant worldview/personal reality but that we never lose the potential of the other two worldviews.

The original topic of today’s Post was to have been the latest developments in the Wakefield Doctrine. And as such, might be of limited interest to the causal reader*. But as DownSpring Molly has said in the past, “Don’t worry too much if they understand what you are saying, clark! If they are interested and don’t understand, they will either figure it out for themselves or ask you.”

But rather than tell you the somewhat esoteric, although totally exciting insight into the rogerian worldview, which holds huge potential to increase our understanding of all three separate worldviews.

With the Wakefield Doctrine you may:

  • identify your worldview as being a clark (which you suspected since the pretty quick after reading this blog) because for you,  ‘there is a whole wide world full of people and things and stuff …’out there’
  • see that your best friend (the one from longest ago) is probably a scott though there is a roger running a close second
  • decide that this Doctrine has a thing or two that you might find handy and so decide to hang out
  • find yourself on a damn international conference call with totally cool guys and remarkably attractive womens and yet, you are comfortable (…clark)
  • need to remind yourself that the Wakefield Doctrine is gender, culture and age neutral
  • find that the rambunctious scotts and the charming rogers and occasionally scary clarks are actually  kinda fun
  • learn ways to self-improve-yourself… the way that you want to change, not necessarily the way that everyone says you should change..

 

 

(bought a beat-up PC and learned how to type…lol)

*yes, on purpose …a little humor for the Writer

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Hiya, Clark! I think I am having a bit of difficulty deciding if I am Clark Rogerian or Rogerian Clark. I am going to read your posts more to understand the two worldviews a bit better to get the balance!!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      @Michelle

      hey! you heard the news about the (soon to happen) google+ hangout online chat thing…. but in the meantime, the best approach is (and it sounds like you are well on your way) you have eliminated the real unlikely one. the scottian worldview. So the question (seems to be) which of the two is your predominant worldview clark or roger.
      If I say to you: the world is all that you see ‘out there’ (does it make sense like, apples fall out of trees) or do you feel, ‘hey what are you, the center of the universe?
      If you feel that what people are like is important and you like history because of the fact that long history makes something more valuable and valid…. (that you like documentaries because they prove that the past was real, is real)

      mostly remember: you can’t get this wrong, it just sometimes takes longer for everything to fall into place… but your sense of looking for more ‘checkpoints’ is suggestive of a rogerian worldview (with a strong secondary clarklike aspect).
      good questions! thanks (it helps with all of us trying to understand this thing when we have people asking questions)

  2. Cyndi says:

    Great to see ya and be back. Just for fun, we went THROUGH the town of Nebo on the way to the beach. It’s like two hours away from here! AHAHAH.
    As for Michelle, I’d have to say she’s a clark roger – all that writing and creativity and “alone” time…followed by the need to occasionally be around people and come out of that shell. That’s my theory. :)

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      @Cyndi

      hey so there is a Nebo!! (are the natives called Nebots? or maybe Nebotians…. Nebopolotans?)
      can’t wait to hear about the vacay… pictures? (I hope) stories (I bet) well, you may have seen, in my response to Michelle I mentioned the incipiant* international call-in thing. Total thanks to you for that “hey guys, why doncha try the google+?” suggestion. Considerer and I have done a couple of test calls… looks like it’s a good one.

      *a rogerian expression

  3. The more I read your posts, the more I am loving the fact that I’m a Clark, lol. Growing up, I hated being shy and an introvert and an outsider. But now, I think it’s something really very cool. Makes me feel goooood, hehehe. Great post, thank you!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      @Melanie

      I know what you mean, now if only we can reach ‘us’ early enough to spare future generations of clarks all that unpleasantness.

      Hey! speaking of clarks, we are getting together the first Wakefield Doctrine ‘Video Brunch-ette Call-in’ I would totally love it if you can call in…it’s on google+ (what they call a ‘hangout’ and it’s online so there’s no monsta telephone bills)… doing it as a brunch cause of the Time Zone thing probably the weekend after this coming at a time to be determined by the participants. Will be writing more about it.