‘rainy Saturday, Easy Post’ the Wakefield Doctrine | the Wakefield Doctrine ‘rainy Saturday, Easy Post’ the Wakefield Doctrine | the Wakefield Doctrine

‘rainy Saturday, Easy Post’ the Wakefield Doctrine

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

hey, call us tonight! 8 to 8:45 pm  we promise to be there *

Our steadfast friends, Janine and Kate and Stephanie and Kate and Amy and Considerer and… Cyndi  do week in retrospect Posts. Well, actually not all of them…just a few of them, but they are still Friends of the Doctrine so go read, already. In any event, at the Doctrine we don’t so much do a ‘week in review’ as much as a ‘since-we-started-writing-this in review’ Posts. (Mostly, but not exclusively on weekends and then only when I read one of those ‘Related Post’ suggestions at the bottom of the Post, usually I use the ones that either a) make me laugh or 2) make me think, ‘what?!?! I wrote that?  what the hell!

So here you are:

‘but, thats impossible!’ clarks, the Wakefield Doctrine and changing reality

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine!  The only self-improvement Movement that is based on the fact that all people are born with the potential to experience the world in one of three characteristic ways, as a clark or (as a) scott or (as a ) roger.

(What do you mean, tomorrow’s guest  ‘is not lined up yet’? How can it be Thursday frickin morning and no guest arranged for Video Friday!!??)

The reason that we call the Wakefield Doctrine a ‘self-improvement Movement’  is that, despite the fact that we all settle into one of  three personality types (usually by the age of 4 or 5), we never lose the capacity to experience the world the way that the other two types do!   As  a self-improvement movement,  we believe that change and development can only come from the individual. Furthermore, it is our conviction that most conventional approaches, belief systems and treatment modalities such as  MBTA, Oscar, Meyers & Briggs, and colorgenics*,  totally miss the mark because they insist on a  focus predicated on what is wrong with the individual.  This is not inconsistent with the ‘disease model’ that dominates most sort of the disease model, ‘cept they are talking about your life, your actual reality that you live and breathe in every day. They want you to believe that it is you that is the problem, not ‘the world’ (or the people in it).

(Seriously…you are supposed to have at least a hint at who tomorrow’s Video interview guest was going to be!!  “We have the rest of today”…now what the hell is that supposed to mean?!)

This is different!  Here at the Doctrine we say, ‘hey, it is not you! It’s the world that you are living in!!’ That’s right, you read that correctly. We maintain that most of the problems that people encounter, on a day-to-basis is a world that is a perfect reflection of their personality type. A clark will encounter a world that has everything they need to be healthy, yet perpetually dissatisfied outsiders; the scotts reading this will look up from their computers and see: prey and predators and a world of action and adventure and our rogerian friends will bask in the glow of knowing that they are the center of the universe and (because of this smug knowledge) will know that all is right with the world.

( So, what you are telling me is that we don’t have a guest lined up for tomorrow’s Video Friday??! I don’t care who you thought you had! No, we are not going to do a re-run! Get someone on the phone and set up the interview).

Sorry about the slightly contrived-sounding asides in today’s Post. The fact of the matter is that we have come to like the idea of interviewing people for Video Friday, but the person I thought I might get, I still have not made the connection with in order to do the interview. Anyone of you Readers up for a telephone interview about the Wakefield Doctrine and it’s benefits? Write a quick comment (your email won’t show publicly, of course), I will follow-up and let you know how these interviews are done. Actually, no secret there; I get in my car, put the Wakefield Doctrine hat on my damn dashboard and dial your number. I ask questions about what you like about the Doctrine and how you explain it to people, we chat a little and thats it! All in about 8 minutes. So write me a Comment, already!

Well, lets put up a video and we will hope for the best. Hey, if tomorrow you have to sit through a video of a clark explaining about clarks, don’t blame us! Hey! did you know that Jimi Hendrix was a clark? Well he was!

 

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Considerer says:

    Why thank you for the link-up. I can’t quite imagine the effort which must go into a ‘since the blog began’ review! Highly ambitious, I’d say and not something I feel I’d be up to the task of. I applaud your confidence.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      @Considerer

      about that since the blog began review project… lol I suspect I am staring at an elephant in disguise. The thing is, I have 789 of ’em, and they were all written ‘from the same place as they are written today’…finding the perfect set of words to describe this Wakefield Doctrine thing. Fortunately it has not been simply a long series of trying the same thing, each time I write a Post, Reply to a Comment, talk to people (about the Doctrine) my understanding deepens and my ‘fluency improves’*. And, as I alluded to, it is fun to come across something that makes you laugh or feel satisfaction at a good attempt to get the idea across to the Readers.

      * currently we are using the idea of fluency to connote the understanding of the reality of the three worldviews…one being fairly easy to do, the ‘other two’ not so easy.

  2. Holy Shit! That’s a lotta thinkn’! I’ve just found you ‘guys’ and as I’m in the midst of a public flogging on Bloppys I think it prudent to swing back through at a later date and clark my scottie. Roger out.

  3. Cyndi says:

    I somehow missed this post when it came out but good stuff. Yeah…I was so not home on Saturday night, lol.
    And I am actually not sure if study hall this Thursday is going to work – it’s an unusual week at school where I’ll be there every day in the afternoons…and I’m not sure when I’ll finish…it’s end-of-the-year stuff…but….if not, I’ll try to call in on Saturday. :)

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      @Cyndi

      the advantage is being not only the pupils but the teachers says we can do the Study hall any damn time we want…and skip a week or two anytime we want, I will be in touch am going to try and do a more ‘serious Post’ on a topic raised by Considerer and asked about by others, i.e. ‘how does one go about determining if they have a secondary and tertiary aspect and which of the ‘other two’ they might be…that will give us plenty to work on even Molly and Denise are not able to get to the call in on Thursday