…what’s everyone reading today at the Doctrine? glad you asked! the Wakefield Doctrine re-run Monday (‘what?! then, make it) …tre-run Tuesday! | the Wakefield Doctrine …what’s everyone reading today at the Doctrine? glad you asked! the Wakefield Doctrine re-run Monday (‘what?! then, make it) …tre-run Tuesday! | the Wakefield Doctrine

…what’s everyone reading today at the Doctrine? glad you asked! the Wakefield Doctrine re-run Monday (‘what?! then, make it) …tre-run Tuesday!

(I noticed, just now,  a Reader from California going to this Post, so I thought, ‘lets see what so interesting about that Post…I read, I laughed… here ya go!)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

What is it we mean when we say that the scottian personality lives in the reality of the predator? Is the Doctrine really suggesting that those who identify their predominant worldview as that of the predator are:

avaricious, carnivorous, predacious, bloodsucking, grasping, larcenous, marauding, pillaging, plundering, foraging, sexy, voracious, voluptuous, vulpine, lupine, canine, supine, teasing, pleasing, quick, snappish, nippy, nasty, pugilistic,, sharkish, aggressive, ravening, ravenous, mercurial, temperamental, tempestuous, predictable, trainable and fun  (courtesy of http://freethesaurus.net  …sort of added a bunch of my own)

hmm, guess I’m gonna go with, “Yes, yes it is!”

Now you should know, that we know that the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) is not for everyone! The ‘everyone’ that it is ‘not for’ includes:

those with a rigid worldview, the people who know what the world is like with certainty that precludes questioning, humorless people, those with limited language skills,  those who think of the Dictionary  the way that the sporadically religious think of the Bible, those who feel that there is a right way and there is a wrong way, those that believe that some things are best left to the professionals, people who take the little warnings at the bottom of virtually every TV commercial as a reassuring sign that the world is protecting them, people who think that language is a powerful weapon and it is not a toy, anyone who says: a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, waste not want not, measure twice cut once, loose lips sinks ships, ask not what you can do for your country, father knows best, listen to your mother and, finally,  the Wakefield Doctrine is not for anyone for whom the term ‘flexible intelligence’ produces a visual of Nadia Comaneci in a Cap and Gown.

What has been totally gratifying is the increasing number of  people that are reading and learning and Commenting on the Doctrine (and) wearing hats and DocTee(s)! …and!  …and they are turning out to be the kind of people with the kind of minds that let them hear the term  ‘predator’ and say, “damn! you’re right. My best friend, she appears to totally have it together and yet it is all about the here and now for her! Try and talk about the ‘what ifs and she goes all blank…and then laughs or gets mad!” (or) “I know what you mean! My friend is surely a scott, he is funny and loves young children but is a relentless tease!” (or even) ” I have never seen anyone who focuses so quickly on a problem, very clever but if the lawn mower refuses to start..watch out! He’s as likely to throw it across the street as he is to fix it”.

So read this here Doctrine here and have some fun. Remember, the really cool thing is that the Wakefield Doctrine works itself! No lie! If you learn what the world of a clark is like (the Outsider) enough to know the major characteristics of the type and if you see how the (Predatory) world of a scott results in people who are quick to act and yet totally confident in appearance, generous to a fault yet totally mercurial, and if you come to be able to imagine living in a world of rules and predictability, connectiveness and certainty that is the (Herd-based) reality of a roger then you can go out into your daily world and you will see them out there. You will not need us to say, “Now remember if a man wears a beret, smokes a pipe and holds forth on the works of Ken Burns, then you have a roger”  You will see them.

…a little spooky, but what the hell, eh?

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Great job as always Clark and you know I always have fun here. So I thank you for that daily my friend. Happy Monday!! :)

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      @Janine

      …not that I think that, as a child I felt deprived because I was not included in on a lot of social groups*, but here we are, a little social group of people who are way… (everything) and we get to have our own secret club**

      *well, any social groups
      ** well, we don’t want it too secret lol (but we’re the ones that years from now people will look over at and say, ‘Janine and that weird guy, they were really in that Doctrine thing in the beginning)

  2. Terrye says:

    Does that mean that the Scotts, as their predatory selves, eat the Rogers and Clarks? I know the thrill of the hunt is one of the greatest adrenaline rushes out there. I wonder if that’s the root cause of cereal killers. And who put the milk carton back in the fridge empty…AGAIN?!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      @Terrye

      exactly! actually rogers are the preferred food group for scotts (they seem to enjoy it…sort of like antelope running around with their own personal flavor packets.) lol one of the reasons that scotts and clarks tend to make fun friends is that clarks are not predators…but we are also not prey (well most of the time), we enjoy our scottian friends but will, from time to time roll up like armadillos or porcupines…

      …and you thought the Doctrine would have a weird kind of response…lol

  3. Cyndi says:

    THe WD is as close to an instruction manual for life as I’m ever going to get. Right now, as clarks will do, I’m wondering about this here online stuff…if I’ll ever get anywhere with it and I’ve been particularly enjoying teaching my elementary school kids lately and soooo clark of me to say, I know.
    I think I’ll go do some art…HAHA

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      @Cyndi

      …as we say, ‘take notes’. I am as much seeing that (being an instruction manual for Life) in this here Doctrine here as you. The more I hear, not just that people like the Doctrine and have fun with it and such, but are finding ways to apply it directly and concretely, the more I realize that I must complete the book (in the works for the last two or three years). We will hope to hear more about the ways that you have found to use the principles of the Doctrine in teaching as well as (for) self-improving yourself. lol

      ..am thinking it might be time to re-new a thing that we did a few times, a ‘Wakefield Doctrine Afternoon Special’…. having the call-in live for an hour during the week when everyone can get together and discuss the practical side of this thing of ours.

  4. My day would not be complete without getting in my dose of The Wakefield Doctrine. Thanks Clark! Have a great Tuesday Choooooosday ;)

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      @Melanie

      lol (in the ‘Before Time’) there was this incredibly primitive cartoon show (it may very well survive in the time warp of cable TV) called Felix the Cat, so I laugh to hear your Chooosday and respond with a “Righty O!”