What were they talking about? the Wakefield Doctrine looks at the ‘other blogs’ | the Wakefield Doctrine What were they talking about? the Wakefield Doctrine looks at the ‘other blogs’ | the Wakefield Doctrine

What were they talking about? the Wakefield Doctrine looks at the ‘other blogs’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of...)

No time! Gotta get a look at the blogs of all of the FOTD’s1 and still meet a client at the SHGC and get ready for tonight’s Saturday Night Drive!! ( hey Jasmine! call us girl2)

DS#1 at Girlie on the Edge1: “don’t look a gift horse in the mouth”

This phrase, it seems, can be traced back to St. Jerome, who referred to it as a common saying in his introductory remarks to the Epistle to the Ephesians in his translation of the New Testament: “Equi donati dentes non inspiciuntur.” A rather mangled literal translation would go something like this: “A given horse’s teeth are not inspected.” This is evident from parsing the original Latin sentence: Equi (masculine genitive singular) donati (perfect passive (supine) masculine genitive singular) dentes (masculine accusative plural) non (negative adverb) inspiciuntur (3rd person plural present passive indicative). It is likely that English versions are translations of this original Latin; furthermore, the Latin form seems to explain the use of “given” (geuen) in the 1546 version.

From early modern English given horse: “No man ought to looke a geuen hors in the mouth.” —John Heywood, 1546.

Horses’ gums recede as they age making their teeth appear longer (hence the term, “long in the tooth”). Inspecting the teeth of a horse given as a gift was considered ungrateful. It would mean that recipient is trying to see if the horse is old (undesirable) or young (more desirable).

The substitution of “gift” for “given” occurred in 1663 in Butler’s Hudibras, because the iambic tetrameter required a shortening:

He ne’er consider’d it, as loth
To look a Gift-horse in the mouth.

(source: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/don’t_look_a_gift_horse_in_the_mouth

 the Progenitor roger at the Secessionist Rag:  Food? you want to know about food??!

Sam J. Porcello (1935 or 1936 – May 12, 2012) was an American food scientist who worked at Nabisco for thirty-four years. He is particularly noted for his work on the modern Oreo cookie. Porcello held five patents directly related to the Oreo. In particular, Porcello was the inventor of the white Oreo cookie creme-filling. His work earned him the nickname, “Mr. Oreo.”

Porcello was born and raised in Newark, New Jersey. He also lived in Wayne, New Jersey. He and his family moved to Tom’s River, New Jersey, in 1974, where he resided for the rest of his life. Porcello initially worked as a teacher for a short time during his early career. He then worked for the former The Charms Company, a candy manufacturer. He was nearly hired by a major cosmetics company, but his candidacy ended when the company learned that Porcello was color blind.

Porcello joined Nabisco after his rejection by the cosmetics industry. When he was hired, Nabisco promised that he could eventually earn a salary of up to $12,000 dollars per year if he was successful. He began his Nabisco career at the company’s plant inFair Lawn, New Jersey. He later worked at Nabisco’s corporate headquarters in East Hanover, New Jersey.

Porcello joined Nabisco’s research and development department, which develops new lines of snack foods. He was considered one of the world’s leading experts on cocoa, which is used to make chocolate. He was given the title, “principal scientist,” during his career at Nabisco. The Oreo cookie, has been sold since 1912 (450 billion Oreos have been sold since their introduction), but it was Porcello who invented the modern creme-filling for Oreos and the Double Stuf Oreo, which has extra filling.

In total, Porcello held five patents related to his work on the Oreo. He also developed a product line of Oreos enrobed in white chocolate and dark chocolate. Porcello found the particular type of chocolate which he used for chocolate-covered Oreos while attending a food industry trade show in Europe.

Aside from his work with the Oreo, Porcello developed other Nabisco snack products, including SnackWells. His position required him to travel extensively in search of new potential products and ingredients. According to his son, Curtis, Porcello often brought new snacks home with him to see how his family liked or disliked the potential new products. Porcello was not a huge eater of Oreo cookies, preferring to eat the cookie without dunking it in milk.

Porcello left the company as its principal food scientist in 1993 after thirty-four years. Additionally, he was a longtime volunteer with ACDI/VOCA, for which he helped create a food and program and company in Thailand.

Sam Porcello died May 12, 2012, at the age of 76. He was survived by his wife, Karen; two sons, David and Curtis; two grandchildren, and his dog, Évry    (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Porcello

Ms. AKH over at: Three Personalities of the Wakefield Doctrine: What? I didn’t say anything!! (thats it, just a little closer now….)

contract is an agreement entered into voluntarily by two parties or more with the intention of creating a legal obligation, which may have elements in writing, though contracts can be made orally. The remedy for breach of contract can be “damages” or compensation of money. In equity, the remedy can be specific performance of the contract or an injunction. Both of these remedies award the party at loss the “benefit of the bargain” or expectation damages, which are greater than mere reliance damages, as in promissory estoppel. The parties may be natural persons or juristic persons. A contract is a legally enforceable promise or undertaking that something will or will not occur. The word promise can be used as a legal synonym for contract, although care is required as a promise may not have the full standing of a contract, as when it is an agreement without consideration.

Contract law varies greatly from one jurisdiction to another, including differences in common law compared to civil law, the impact of received law, particularly from England in common law countries, and of law codified in regional legislation. Regarding Australian Contract Law for example, there are 40 relevant acts which impact on the interpretation of contract at the Commonwealth (Federal / national) level, and an additional 26 acts at the level of the state of NSW. In addition there are 6 international instruments or conventions which are applicable for international dealings, such as the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Vienna Sales Convention)  (wikipedia:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract )

(what do you mean ‘out of space’??! this is a blog! there ain’t no such thing as ‘out of space’!! Keep scrolling!!)

Molly at Journey (nah…better luck finding her over at ‘the FaceBook’ she do make them sit up and pay attention!)

Steampunk is influenced by, and often adopts the style of, the 19th-century scientific romances of Jules Verne, H.G. Wells, and Mary Shelley.

20th century precursors

Several works of art and fiction significant to the development of the genre were produced before the genre had a name. Titus Alone (1959), by Mervyn Peake, anticipated many of the tropes of steampunk. Remedios Varo’s paintings combine elements of Victorian dress, fantasy, and technofantasy imagery. One of the earliest mainstream manifestations of the steampunk ethos was the original CBS television series The Wild Wild West (1965–69), which inspired the film Wild Wild West (1999). The film Brazil (1985) was an important early cinematic influence toward creating the genre.

Origin of the term

Although many works now considered seminal to the genre were published in the 1960s and 1970s, the term steampunk originated in the late 1980s as a tongue in cheek variant of cyberpunk. It seems to have been coined by science fiction author K. W. Jeter, who was trying to find a general term for works by Tim Powers (The Anubis Gates, 1983); James Blaylock (Homunculus, 1986); and himself (Morlock Night, 1979, and Infernal Devices, 1987)—all of which took place in a 19th-century (usually Victorian) setting and imitated conventions of such actual Victorian speculative fiction as H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine. In a letter to science fiction magazine Locus, printed in the April 1987 issue, Jeter wrote:

Dear Locus,Enclosed is a copy of my 1979 novel Morlock Night; I’d appreciate your being so good as to route it Faren Miller, as it’s a prime piece of evidence in the great debate as to who in “the Powers/Blaylock/Jeter fantasy triumvirate” was writing in the “gonzo-historical manner” first. Though of course, I did find her review in the March Locus to be quite flattering.Personally, I think Victorian fantasies are going to be the next big thing, as long as we can come up with a fitting collective term for Powers, Blaylock and myself. Something based on the appropriate technology of the era; like “steampunks”, perhaps…
—K.W. Jeter

Modern steampunk

While Jeter’s Morlock Night and Infernal Devices, Power’s Anubis Gates, and Blaylock’s Lord Kelvin’s Machine were the first novels to which Jeter’s neologism would be applied, they gave the term little thought at the time.[9] However, they were far from the first modern science fiction writers to speculate on the development of steam-based technology or alternate histories. Keith Laumer’s Worlds of the Imperium (1962) and Ronald W. Clark’s Queen Victoria’s Bomb (1967) apply modern speculation to past-age technology and society. Michael Moorcock’s Warlord of the Air (1971) is another early example. Harry Harrison’s novel A Transatlantic Tunnel, Hurrah! (1973) portrays a British Empire of an alternate year 1973, full of atomic locomotives, coal-powered flying boats, ornate submarines, and Victorian dialogue. In February 1980 Richard A. Lupoff and Steve Stiles published the first “chapter” of their 10-part comic strip The Adventures of Professor Thintwhistle and His Incredible Aether Flyer.

The first use of the word in a title was in Paul Di Filippo’s 1995 Steampunk Trilogy, consisting of three short novels: “Victoria,” “Hottentots,” and “Walt and Emily,” which, respectively, imagine the replacement of Queen Victoria by a human/newt clone, an invasion of Massachusetts by Lovecraftian monsters, and a love affair between Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson. (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steampunk )

Nell Rose (who is all over ‘the Hubpages’ seems to have started something at blogger or gblog or whatever the hell they call it!  go here  be sure to tell ‘er that the Doctrine sent ya )

Abdominal exercises are useful for building the abdominal muscles. This is useful for improving performance with certain sports, back pain, taking punches. Abdominal muscle exercises are known to increase the strength and endurance of the abdominal muscles as well (Vispute et. al.). It has been a highly disputed topic whether or not abdominal exercises have any impact on the reduction of abdominal fat. The study by Vispute et. al. found that in fact doing abdominal exercise does not reduce abdominal fat. To reduce abdominal fat one must create a deficit in energy expenditure and caloric intake, doing abdominal exercises alone were not enough to reduce the girth of the abdomen (Vispute et. al.)  (source:   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdominal_exercise )

Mel  (well, the tbwfkaM3) at Mostly Teachable  … the guy claims to live in ‘Michigan’, what more can we say?

The name Marathon comes from the legend of Pheidippides, a Greek messenger. The legend states that he was sent from the battlefield of Marathon to Athens to announce that the Persians had been defeated in theBattle of Marathon (in which he had just fought), which took place in August or September, 490 BC. It is said that he ran the entire distance without stopping and burst into the assembly, exclaiming “νικωμεν’(nikomen)”, We have won), before collapsing and dying. The account of the run from Marathon to Athens first appears in Plutarch’s On the Glory of Athens in the 1st century AD which quotes from Heraclides Ponticus’s lost work, giving the runner’s name as either Thersipus of Erchius or Eucles. Lucian of Samosata (2nd century AD) also gives the story but names the runner Philippides (not Pheidippides).

There is debate about the historical accuracy of this legend. The Greek historian Herodotus, the main source for the Greco-Persian Wars, mentions Pheidippides as the messenger who ran from Athens to Sparta asking for help, and then ran back, a distance of over 240 kilometres (150 mi) each way. In some Herodotus manuscripts the name of the runner between Athens and Sparta is given as Philippides. Herodotus makes no mention of a messenger sent from Marathon to Athens, and relates that the main part of the Athenian army, having already fought and won the grueling battle, and fearing a naval raid by the Persian fleet against an undefended Athens, marched quickly back from the battle to Athens, arriving the same day.

In 1879, Robert Browning wrote the poem Pheidippides. Browning’s poem, his composite story, became part of late-19th century popular culture and was accepted as a historic legend.

Mount Penteli stands between Marathon and Athens, which means that, if Pheidippides actually made his famous run after the battle, he had to run around the mountain, either from the north or from the south. The latter and more obvious route matches almost exactly the modern Marathon-Athens highway, which follows the lay of the land southwards from Marathon Bay and along the coast, then a gentle but protracted uphill westwards towards the eastern approach to Athens, between the foothills of Mounts Hymettus and Penteli, and then mildly downhill to Athens proper. This route, as it existed when the Olympics were revived in 1896, was approximately 40 kilometres (25 mi), but was later extended to the current standard marathon distance of 42.195 kilometres (26 miles 385 yards, approximately 26.22 miles). However there have been suggestions that Pheidippides might have followed another route: a westward climb along the eastern and northern slopes of Mount Penteli to the pass of Dionysos, and then a straight southward downhill path to Athens. This route is considerably shorter, some 35 kilometres (22 mi), but features a very steep initial climb of more than 5 kilometres (3.1 mi).  (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marathon)

Call us tonight: 1-218-339-0422  (wait… nice ‘woman’ will invite you to be surrounded by Wakefield and to enter the following Conference code: 512103  and hit Pound Sign  go ahead, do it! Life is a limited resource…call us, we will guarantee your Satisfaction!)

1) FOTDs Friends of the Doctrine

2) no, don’t call us girlcall us, girl   unless you want to talk to only girls…then, I guess, hey Jasmine! call them girls

3) ‘tbwfkaM’  the blog writer formerly known as Mel

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Jennifer says:

    I actually made it through (barely) your addressing the scotts. Didn’t mean a damn thing. But that was your intention, yes? To see how long a scott would continue reading something that is, quite frankly, of no interest to her/him. After that I concluded my reading of the rest of the post. Perhaps later…
    Yeah, you got what you were looking for. A fucking comment.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      good girl! (you caught me, though! there is a connection to your blog something to do with the Post before the most Current Post)….
      “Whether it be negotiating a business contract, trying to establish a repertoire with someone or positively influencing a relationship I’d be willing to bet that you will get your way 99.9% of the time. Seriously! Here’s the deal:

      damn, maybe I better go back and quote from them Posts what I keyed on!!

  2. Jennifer says:
  3. Steve Crabtree says:

    Gang of WD = as always, my distracted mind (juggling balls while typing) has me putting COMMENTS into hidden spots such as drawers and unworn coat pockets (ever hide stuff there?) So, excuse me while I kiss the sky and post these in comments, as directed by the director. Ha ha! Thats fresh! Will someone tell my spouse I CAN actually follow instruction? The week of hell or high water for me. Hope yours is a refreshing pace and as glorious as flash runner BOLT = that guy could outrun a horse ! Unreal stride. I digress . . . here are my ramblings, I WILL be with you Sat night this week now that I’m going to have the number etched into my flesh. On to my dos comments, amigos.
    ________________________________________________________________________________

    Well, duh. Thanks for the number, I am headed to the tattoo parlor Monday to have it inscribed in a safe place on my body. Sounds like I missed all the fun. But, I tried, was prepared, like showing up on the front lines without a weapon.

    Glad to see someone used conundrum. So, since I missed out on the conversation, I watched Beavis and Butthead to see if I could identify their CSR personality. I think I did. I also tried to see which one I was, having misplaced the 218-339-0422 access code 512103 in an email. I did find some spare change in the couch, and some interesting things under the rug (no, not Trumps). I have posted THE pic on my FB page of myself with the CSR cap on. I have gone back to basics in understanding the THREE personality traits, and I must say, everyone fits ONE, even if some others creep in like clothing on you. Naked? You are a Clark Roger or Scott. The small nuances don’t change that. Just reactions to environmental changes, however, you remain one or the other. I long considered the 80/20 or 60/40 percentages, but have tossed that since, say a Roger, will return back to being a Roger once Katrina blows past.

    I regards to country music being the new ‘rock’, refer to ‘crossover’ in music. The old Alabama song “there’s gotta be a fiddle in the band” might hold true to get into the country genre, but the Marshall stacks and those shredding guitar solos and solid (what I consider hard rock) drumming, well that separates from old George Jones (your Grandpa’s country) to a younger, wider audience, delivering more of a powerful sound, but add steel guitar, banjo, fiddle, mandolin, and you can make Whitesnake ‘country’. It’s all just a ploy to KEEP the younger audience’s attention. Remember, TRUE COUNTRY is in the past – Montgomery Gentry and others are the result of the NEW country sound. In contrast, the genre ‘AMERICANA’ is a TEXAS holding, most songwriters from TX claim this genre, the Austin sound, etc, Townes Van Zandt, Steve Earle, Lyle Lovett and many others lay claim to this genre. So, you will go (maybe if you get free tix) to a Brad Paisley show and hear ROCK COUNTRY, as compared to a Willie Nelson who’s band is so old that you will be lucky to hear anything close to a rock tune. Good awareness, true comment, yes those are Marshall amps and smoking guitars. Go see Dwight Yoakum, his guitarist Pete Anderson (former, they split) was awesome, terrific in fact.

    Gonna watch a video of Friday Episode 13. Hope it’s as good as a Sons of Anarchy Episode. Next week, have number, will travel via transmission. Don’t you just love technology? We will soon know each other’s DNA strand by number and be able to down them by exploiting their genetic flaws. Think about that.

    Crab

    August 5, 2012 at 6:45 pm
    I just watched the DSPhyllis episode. I didn’t gather much info, the HERD problem is a problem with me. I want to be part of a herd, just not the avg member of a HERD. I want to LEAD the herd in the right direction, the one I think is correct. As far as Scottian threat? I quickly recognize they like to lead and attempt to control, but Rogers let them, however, and let them BELIEVE they are leading and, according to Doctrine, this can stop it dead in it’s tracks. In other words, let them lead the herd. It’s their decision or mine, depending on their intentions. If they want to usurp me? Wrong move. They will find a Roger who will be a WALL of defense, unless, of course, they adhere to MY logic. I have this issue with, once believing I am correct, listening to any other herd garbage, to put it as nicely as possible. The video was most entertaining, as I watched the driving in circles rather interesting – I do that to kill time. I would suspect DSPHYLLIS to be a conformist, one who will fit in and lead from the pack, perhaps a middle-aged Roger, not a stirrer, or a rockish, cocky BS’er such as myself.

    I wished I would have heard more about how she handled Scottian pushiness or how she felt the NEED? to fit in with the herd. Herd. You either lead the herd, or you are a follower of the herd. Jerry Jones is a Roger who leads a herd. Or, is he? So, if you desire to lead a herd, at the same time possessing the ability to ‘fit in’ with the herd, are you a chameleon in disguise? Or, a superior Roger? Or, yikes, NOT a Roger? Just want to clarify. I choose to lead, hate to follow. That being said, I’m no bully, no, but I do have my own direction and will NOT deviate from what I believe. Scotts, it seems to me, are threatened by the disarmament capabilities of Rogers, that’s just my take. Any thoughts?