Video Friday Episode 14 (Please do not watch this video)* the Wakefield Doctrine live!!

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

*Yeah, we are employing a fairly transparent sales technique 1  with today’s Post Title, but we kinda mean it! 

See what we meant?

Still here?  Fine, then here’s the thing,  all of us here at the Doctrine agree that the idea of having a Video Post (along with the written Posts) is a great idea. We have real people talking about the Wakefield Doctrine and everyday life. What could be better?  You hear from people who have learned about the Wakefield Doctrine and they describe how they use the Doctrine and the benefits they have enjoyed. Testimonial is the term used in sales.
The challenge we have in producing these videos is the same as it is writing these Posts, i.e. how to organise and present the information in a way that will resonate with clarks and with scotts and with rogers!  Unfortunately for all of you, the last minute of the First Video (which is really the Third of the series comprising Episode 14) is clipped. DownSpring glenn was asked to invite our scottian Viewers to participate,  using the language that would force the scotts in the audience to pay attention (I’ll leave the visual to you Readers…lol).  Fortunately, also clipped was DownSpring glenn extending an invitation for our rogerian Readers to join the party. (Also leave that to your imagination). So following is Part 2 (which is actually Part 2) (sort of) 

Now the to the beginning of the process, the actual opening of the Video episode:

Instead of trying to figure this shit out, why not go over to DS#1’s Post here, there is a really interesting discussion going one ‘tween DS#1 and Molly  pertaining to clarklike females and such!

1)   ‘take away’, which is when you tell a person about something and tell them that they can’t have it. Ask Alex.


clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one


  1. Downspring#1 says:

    (insert sound of clapping hands….and a whistle or two)

    Fine job gentlemen and that is not a term casually used in connection with scottian men:)
    I applaud your astute questioning of the “creator” during vid 2 glenn. It was by all standards informational. Well done.

    P.S Noticed the tags for this post. Want to explain that?

  2. clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

    the tags?… sorry, it’s kinda a guy thing. glenn? roger? anyone one to answer DS#1’s query?

  3. Downspring#1 says:

    Yeah, explain that guys:) LOL
    Gina’s character, Jennifer’s character….tell the audience what they are – clark, scott or roger?
    I’ll be waiting…oh, and don’t spare any of the details (as to why)

  4. Molly Molly M. says:

    It is nice knowing the origins of this theory. Thank.

  5. clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

    …if you must know, my talking to glenn about specifics of the past is an effect of the Wakefield Doctrine.
    (as a clark, it is my preference to ‘cloud my personal history’…Carlos Castanada’s don Juans advice), but this Doctrine, she a funny theeng…sure I invent, develop and write the principles, yes, maam that was me…but now the Doctrine it grows by itself…eyiie carumba!!

    It is no longer possible for me to be shy or modest about the potential use and (in those uses, the value) of this ‘theory’ or Doctrine or whatever the hell term you might find appropriate, this I know for certain, I have used the viewpoints and the perspectives that are inherent in the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers and I have seen it result in a benefit in my own damn life.

    Pretty fuckin cool, is all this here Doctrine here is, pretty cool.

  6. Downspring#1 says:

    …and that is the point…to use “the viewpoints and the perspectives that are inherent in the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers” for the benefit of one’s own self. Why? Well, why the hell not! Oh, that’s right. scotts don’t need to improve themselves because they are fine the way they are. rogers? there are some who will pick and choose aspects of the Doctrine and use it to their benefit (secretly) but honestly, most of the rogers I have spoken with dismiss the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers as nothing more than a fleeting clarklike curio. It’s too outside the Box. Who’s left?! clarks.
    Funny thing this (WD) because as this “theory” continues to prove itself little by little in my own life I enjoy it that much more!