the Wakefield Doctrine, a unique theory of personality…outloud! | the Wakefield Doctrine the Wakefield Doctrine, a unique theory of personality…outloud! | the Wakefield Doctrine

the Wakefield Doctrine, a unique theory of personality…outloud!

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

…now scroll down and write a Comment.

(If you have not had all your questions answered, then go:   ask the roger  or beg the scottian Ms AKH   or ask nicely and DS#1 might answer.   (Hell, you could go over to Hub Pages and read about Una or even our damn FaceBook page

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Lunchbox Lenny says:

    2 clarks talking…So boring it’s fascinating. All head stuff. Nothing visceral. All steak–NO sizzle. Interesting, and I do love me some clarks. But, whenever two clarks are talking, it is so boring that the people in the building NEXT DOOR start falling asleep. Birds drop out of the trees–bored plum to death. Innocent bystanders find themselves permanently unable to focus their attention on anything. It actually changes the brain chemistry. Helpless, panicked villagers flee in terror as the Wave of Utter Boredom bears down on them. And yet, oddly fascinating. You ask yourself, How can two human beings engage in a discussion so deathly boring to the rest of us—and not be bored themselves? How is that possible? How can two human beings with active, agile, nimble minds not fucking NOTICE how boring their conversation is? Such a paradox. So boring, it’s fascinating. Clarks–can’t live with ’em…pass the biscuits. Actually, to be fair, Clark DID notice how boring it was. He kept “moving on” while DS1 was still talking. He sensed that listeners might be tuning out–Hell, they might be DYING. He kept trying to prod DS1 into saying something…provocative, noteworthy..”big”, But, all there was to be had was …just thoughts..no reactions, no emotions. For Christmas this year, I am buying all my clarks a 50 gallon drum of adrenaline. I hope it doesn’t kill them.

  2. Downspring#1 says:

    snore……wake me at the end of the comment…….talk about boring……

    How come you don’t comment as glenn anymore Lunchbox? (I don’t really want to know. Rhetorical.)
    Guess you like the moniker I gave you in one of Girlie’s past posts, boring as it was, eh?

    Do you have anything constructive, informative, interesting to add to the conversation? Anything funny?
    I bet glenn does…..

  3. Downspring#1 says:

    The still on the second vid. is frightening:) Makes me think of Donnie and S. Darko….

  4. RCoyne RCoyne says:

    A brief window to send a comment-
    Can’t run the vid, IE6 on board, can’t upgrade…
    Was still thinking that Lenny is pretty funny. The bird thing cracked me up. Raises a question, though. If a scott comes up on two clarks being clarks, does he go into attack mode?

  5. clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

    … now I’m just a little ole country creator and such and don’t cotton to no fancy speechifyin’ but fer the questions y’all are askin… I say step back and look at them Comments, up above….seems like this fella Lenny has got his underclothes in the biggest bunch of all of you people.

    We got a sayin ’round these parts…” them whats can, do….thems that cain’t squawk …like a rooster without no weddin parts”

  6. Lunchbox Lenny says:

    A cock without a cock? That what you are tryin’ to say? And just fer the record–I ain’t a wearin’ no underclothes. So there. I didn’t mean no harm to the little lady. I was just a sayin’–Fire it UP a bit! Y’all are losin’ the audience. Folks is snoozin’ and drowsin” while you two just palaver on and on. But I know you cain’t he’p it. I’m gone to answer the question aksed by the roger: The answer is NO. Two clarks suck all the energy out of everything for a 5 mile radius. Can’t get up no energy for attackin’. No..we go into hibernation mode. We find a hole somewheres and we goes to sleep fer a good long time. Have to wait a long time though…after the clarks talk the planet stays very borin’ for months afterward. Can’t wake up until the planet get innerestin’ agin. ‘Til some scotts and rogers do somethin’…

  7. Lunchbox Lenny says:

    IE6 on board. Can’t upgrade. What the fuck kinda talk is that? I got yer IE6..RIGHT HERE!!!

  8. AKH says:

    Love ya DS1 but I have to go with Lunchbox Lenny on this one. Quite a winding road. A “conversation” between two clarks is something out of The Twilight Zone. One of ’em starts talking and the next thing you know you’re wondering wtf is he/she talking about. The mind can be seen floating off to wherever the hell clarks go. It’s like being on a plane that you need to disembark before you’re sent soaring into the atmosphere with ’em. Holy Mary, Mother of God, this is going to be a long frickin’ flight. Excuse me stewardess, I need a pair of headphones…

    Hey Lenny! Commando baby… right on! That’s how we scotts roll…

  9. AKH says:

    In retrospect I think that this video is an excellent example for our readers in terms of the inner workings of the mind of a clark as stated in the Doctrine (among other things):

    “clarks live inside their own heads because it’s all much better in there”

  10. RCoyne RCoyne says:

    Well, well. Just installed new graphics card successfully, and we’re back. Finally.
    Just watched the video with DS1, and have to say…nice job, Girlie. A bit Clarkish overall ( that explains all the birds laying around ) but also a few nice nuggets of wisdom there. And isn’t it just totally Clark to keep warning the subject about time restraints, and then keep interrupting her to re-phrase. You gotta learn to believe in the subject matter, and just let the thing roll. It’ll all come out in the end.
    Speaking of scottian lawyers, Jose Baez wins the case of his life, and then drops the ball ten minutes later with the champagne celebration. And the girl… severely dysfunctional, yes…but basically C,S, or R? I can’t even begin to sort that one out.

  11. Downspring#1 says:

    Thanks RCoyne:)
    Yes, it was a bit clarkish but nowhere near the “conversational level” when not on the spot and under the public eye-ear. Don’t know if the public could handle a “hidden camera” clark/clark conversation. LOL
    Which makes me wonder…..have I ever been in a 3 way clark conversation. (NO COMMENTS LUNCHBOX! OR ANY OTHER scotts for that matter)
    Actually, RCoyne makes a good point. The clarklike tendency for feeling self-conscious (not to be confused with feeling nervous) sometimes interferes with a more “natural” flow of conversation (with a clark).