Video-Post Episódio Cinco the Doctrine of Wakefield: personality theory for the rest of us! | the Wakefield Doctrine Video-Post Episódio Cinco the Doctrine of Wakefield: personality theory for the rest of us! | the Wakefield Doctrine

Video-Post Episódio Cinco the Doctrine of Wakefield: personality theory for the rest of us!

Hey there!  Relax…sit back and let them good vibrations…as a matter of fact, seeing how today is ‘sit back and Listen’ day at the ‘Doctrine, lets just put up a chart to compare the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) to all the major Religions and Philosophies and Whatnot.*   That way a new Reader can advantage themselves of a totally un-biased and neutral-like Comparison Chart.

Major religion/philosophy (including but not Limited to: Christianity, Islam, Buddhism)    the Wakefield Doctrine      The Winner
     
Sacred rites, rituals and liturgy developed over  thousands of years of human history …hats        The WD!!
Millions of followers 35 to 50 ‘regular’ Readers …major Rs and Ps…
Responsibility for Crusades and Jihads and such resulting in millions of  Deaths and
untold suffering
Music videos and clever photos       The WD!!
Possible backing from major   Deities (including but not limited to: Allah,  Jesus, Yahweh and
“the-unseeing-eye-in-the  Face-you-had-before”….never mind, lets go with Krishna)
Progenitors and DownSprings (and implicit support from ‘Jethro’)   The WD!!
Genuine insight into the human condition, providing comfort and salvation to millions over thousands of years
in the tortured course of Human History
Hats! (we already said, “Hats “?) damn… …Too close to call

There you have it!  Objective proof that the Wakefield Doctrine is destined to become the next major mischief maker, philosophy/religion in a long line of movements that have made Man’s existence such a joy!

*No one has to tell you that, when it comes to any of the major religions, sects, dogmas, philosophies, belief systems and anything else that works as a guide to the here and the hereafter, that more than likely it was a clark who came up with the idea a roger who organised and made it palatable for the masses and a scott….well a scott to have a few wars based on the differences between these ideas.**

**…unless, of course there was a scottian female involved and then, in that case….think: Queen of Sheba, Gaia, Aunt Jemima, Cleopatra, Betsy Ross, Hazel Delguidice, Ethel Mertz….you get the idea.***

*** …speakin of tha sistas, be sure to git on over to the jersy curl and  the 3 times ain’t nearly enough   blogs! They alright!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCeD_6Y3GQc

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. AKH says:

    Excellent video on 2 points since it is, in fact, ’2’s day’. To perhaps reiterate:

    1. Interesting and valid analogy of the Wakefield Doctrine as being similar to religious/philosophical beliefs. If one takes the time to stop and think about it, all religious and philosophical movements were/are based on a system of beliefs (as referred to in the above video). In fact, I tried an experiment which validates this. I googled ‘beliefs’ and what where the top results/suggestions? beliefs of Islam, beliefs of Christianity, beliefs of Buddhism and so on. The point? Beliefs are accepting something as being true. They are not based on categories. Which brings me to point number 2 (ya know,‘2’s day’…):

    2. Categorization. It is important for the readers to realize that the Wakefield Doctrine is in no way a system of categories. That is to say, the WD is not trying to put people ’in a box’ but rather give or suggest to people an understanding that it is your overall belief of 3 characteristic perceptions (of reality) that is the basis of your personality. clarks, scotts and rogers are not catergories. They are simply terms referring to a set of characteristics which, by the way, anyone can relate to.

  2. clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

    I like and therefore agree with your point about ‘beliefs’. It’s amazing what people are willing to do in the name of a belief, (they will) live, marry die and kill…for a reason that is ‘simply a belief’.
    Almost in the realm of a contradiction, our rogerian friends who build upon facts, laws and proven principles are the ones who will form the masses of: catholics, prostestants, muslims, buddhists, Kiwanis, BPOE, Order of DeMolay, the YMCA, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Cub Scouts, Brownies, Rotarians, Rastafarians, Knights Templar, Knights of Columbus, swamis and druids and priests ( oh my!)

    All based on beliefs. Like the Wakefield Doctrine is based on a belief that all people have the potential to experience the world in one of three characteristic ways, as a clark or a scott or a roger.

    Pretty simple, isn’t it?