(the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
welcome to the wakefield doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
great Saturday Night Drive…tired… will add to Post later in the afternoon…go ahead and read some of the old stuff..
Oh! wait, two memory fragments from last night….T Shirts and (really intriguing but vague..) ‘Your Life in 3 Photos Contest’…(i think it involved a contest)…not sure…check back later…
About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.*
*which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one
Congratulations! - You’ve just discovered the Wakefield Doctrine!!
(Assuming you have at least the IQ of my dog Una) Read the rest of this ...you can thank us later... [Read More…]
© 2009-2012 the Wakefield Doctrine All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright
In this particular case time travel began the moment I saw the cover of this very fine album. All musicians exceptional, functioning in such symbiotic musicality. Can’t decide if I prefer the guitar or bass in this composition.
If this woman is claiming for her own the Town of Narragansett then at least it should be visible “who” she is. Tell us – is she a clark, scott or roger? Difficult to read the red print.
The “gentleman” behind her. No hat for his damn head?
[Translate]
lol…ask them!
[Translate]
to DS1:
perhaps a re-take is in order to see “who” i am. you have a good point.
the “gentleman” didn’t have his hat. offered to borrow mine but since i was already claiming narragansett that was not an option. oh yeah, i also claimed him since he’s in the photo! lol
[Translate]