Wakefield Doctrine, personality, theory of… Video Post Episodio Quattro | the Wakefield Doctrine Wakefield Doctrine, personality, theory of… Video Post Episodio Quattro | the Wakefield Doctrine

Wakefield Doctrine, personality, theory of… Video Post Episodio Quattro

Hey! Wakefield Doctrine fans! 

(please take notes as there will be a short quiz at the end of our little Presentation)
(….thank you)

Please take out a pencil, pen, stylus, crayon, keyboard or achieve a mental state dominated by theta waves. The following 3 multiple choice questions and 1 essay question should be answered as quickly and with as little reflection as possible:

The Narrator used a Latin term in today’s Post which meant:

  1. professional arm-wrestler’s association
  2. Friday’s Special:  Fish ‘n Chips
  3. exchange one thing of value in return for another thing of value
  4. hey, fuck! a test!! what the hell?

In the course of today’s Post  reference was made to a roger in a commercial that offered to transform unruly children, was that commercial:

  1. yeah! I saw that one, the frickin guy had on wire-rim glasses and a 80’s porn-‘stash, what a maroon!
  2. well, if it was on television and the person in it meant well and was popular, I can’t see how you could criticize them so cruelly
  3. hey!! this really is a test!! wait!! slow down!! I’m smart, I can do things!!
  4. yeah!! I know who you mean! that guy’s got a website and everything!! video testimonials from the little brainwashed kids that have such weak-willed parents that they would pay this hack a lot of money to mess with their kids…damn  maybe the Doctrine should have some video Testimonials!
  5. …yeah, right

(Final Multiple Choice Question) The Narrator referred to personality-driven presentation, what do you think he meant:

  1. Clearly he meant that people are more likely to respond to a personal approach, rather than a dry, lifeless recitation of facts and information.
  2. Fuck!!!
  3. hey!! wait!! that wasn’t really my answer!! he,  he just meant that nobody listens to…could you repeat the question?…or yeah!! like how when one of those weird people at work, the ones you see in the back of the crown who are laughing when no one else is and when you go up to them and try to…you know, fuck with ’em cause the crowd likes it and these weird ones still laugh even though you know that they know you’re fuckin with ’em…it’s like they’re not afraid and that they are havin their own little joke at the same time?…Like that that…Yeah! fuc…
  4. I’m sure the Narrator was trying to make a valid point, as much as he was capable of, in his limited way. The point he was clearly trying to make was that he was unable to present the value of the Doctrine thingie and that he wished he had a more balanced personality and then people would like him, or whatever. I really wasn’t paying that much attention. Now, if you ask me…

(Essay Question) Which of the three personality types ( clark or scott or roger ) would you like to see/hear the Narrator interview on a Video Post and why is that?

  1. Well, certainly if they hope to get anyone to listen to this quirky little gimmick of a video, I know everyone would agree it should be a roger. Why? You should have to ask, clearly you have a limited understanding of this Wakefield Doctrine or you would not make an obviously uniformed statement like that…no, I am not being critical, just trying to help, you know? Well, if they have a roger in the next interview, at least the Readers will understand what is being said and mostly the Readers will sit through the whole Post, instead of getting up and walking off in the middle of the thing. No, you are welcome.
  2. Fuck! scott! of course!! hey people want to have fun!!! fuck!! and everyone always loves to hear what we have to shout…yeah? you ever see a scott alone?? Thats your proof that scotts are the one personality that everyone fuckin loves!!! we are always at the center of every thing….shout?  no that is what everyone loves about scotts they force us to shout!! hey, the world would be a fuckin way more fun place if they was to let scotts run things, ya know what I mean?? so yeah they oughta let them scotts get up there!!!
  3. damn, how the hell should I know…this is all too complicated…no, I understand everything, but in order to make a comprehensive interviewee, they would need to find a clark who has been given enough time to prepare and plan and then, of course there would have to be editing control, you know to go back to the video and clarify any points of inadvertent confusion…but yes, now that you ask, I think they should interview a clark next…that would get them back on track.

 Now, we have done our part, it is up to you to do yours.

Write down the number and call us during the Saturday Night Drive or write us a Comment and let us know where you are setting up a Chapter of the Wakefield Doctrine.
Pretty simple, isn’t it?

If you need  more advice go read more about the Doctrine at Girlies Deluxe or 3 not 2 Three Personality Types. These are the blogs of DS#1 and Ms AKH, respectively and they gots the goods.

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Downspring#1 says:

    “Global picnic, real or imagined (depends on how many clarks there are)”. Think the quote is accurate…an excellent line btw.
    Nice post -ee today.

    Fabri!?! You out there? Tell me you do not agree with the quoted statement that was made? >;]