New Carbon 14 Dating proves Christ rose from the tomb Easter Morning, but not until ‘at least 9, maybe even 9:30’ | the Wakefield Doctrine New Carbon 14 Dating proves Christ rose from the tomb Easter Morning, but not until ‘at least 9, maybe even 9:30’ | the Wakefield Doctrine

New Carbon 14 Dating proves Christ rose from the tomb Easter Morning, but not until ‘at least 9, maybe even 9:30’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

Mis-leading Title?, what the hell are you talking about? We say with complete authority that the Wakefield Doctrine never challenges or otherwise criticizes  (an) individual’s religious beliefs, unless it forms the basis of a really good Post. But since you raised the question, lets look at what the Wakefield Doctrine  tells us about religion and it’s appeal to each of the three personality types.

When it comes to religion and the three personality types of the Wakefield Doctrine, the answer boils down to two words:  rogers!  It is not just that rogers are the personality type that is drawn to religion, they are the one who invented it!  The link between the rogerian personality type and religion is so strong as to form the foundation of the description of the rogerian worldview.

As we do know, that it is integral to the rogerian worldview  there be organised religion. This is true simply because rogers have the need not only to establish rules and order for everyone, but to have these rules posess a degree of moral imperative that can only derive from a deity or deities

(The rogerian nature of organised religion is so clear and well-established, we will not spend any further time in today’s Post examining it. The  link (‘we do know’) will take you to a Post that goes into more depth on the subject; if you have questions about rogers and religion, write us a Comment and you will be answered.)

If rogers have the baseline lock on organised religion, where does that leave our other two personality types? The genius of the Wakefield Doctrine, is found in the fact that the answer (to this and any other question) lies in the perception of the world that clarks and scotts have as their realities. If you consider the nature of the world that the clark or the scott is perceiving, you will apprehend the value and role that a major life feature such as religion holds for them.

clarks?
, they’re easy! clarks believe in the un-believeable, unfortunately this ability prevents them from ever having complete faith in anything. In regards to religious dogma, clarks will give convincing lip service, in particular the clarklike females (who have a slight edge over their male counterparts in terms of protective coloration);  a clarklike female, especially those with a family unit will conform to the local norms for religious activities. But the odds are, even these devoutly religious clarkmoms will be filling their downsprings heads with all sorts of apostolic nonsense at random points in their upbringing. If backed into a corner, most clarks will confess to a definite spiritual tropism, but you have better have a thesaurus and a comfortable chair nearby! If you read the page on clarks, one of the primary characteristics of this type is the love of knowledge…useful knowledge…useless knowledge, knowledge for good and knowledge to anger people, does not matter to your typical clark.   So as to organised religion, lets put the clarks in the woman’s auxiliary section.

scotts
now,  they totally relate to religion, even organised religion! scotts relate to the ‘product’/ the result/ the ‘output’, if you will, of organised religion.
There was a ‘restaurant’  called The Automat, it was sort of cool for us suburban kids in the early 60’s to hear about a restaurant that was totally mechanised. (This was all pre-fast food as we know it today). The Automat’s ‘hook’, was to offer a variety of choices of foods to customers with no intermediary such a waiter or waitress, everything there was available and purely the choice of the hungry customers.
….Throughout history, organised religions have basically served as Automat for scotts.

  • hey scott! bored and want to stir up some excitement?….we got your Crusades, right here!!
  • hey scott, stuck in a agrarian culture, nothing to do…why not pitch a tent and have a ‘ole down-home’ revial meetin
  • oh, scott! you are soo stuck in a modern civilized society…had you given any thought to perhaps joining the priesthood?

You know what we mean. scotts have no use for religions (organised or otherwise) other than (it’s) effect of organising people into groups, … you know, herds.

…..and the maître d’hôtel,  Monsieur Roehger will be right with you….

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one