Comments on: it’s Sunday boys, ain’t no time to waste http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/05/23/the-wakefield-doctrine-its-sunday-boys-aint-no-time-waste/ (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:39:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/05/23/the-wakefield-doctrine-its-sunday-boys-aint-no-time-waste/#comment-1153 clarkscottroger Mon, 24 May 2010 20:37:27 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=2888#comment-1153 ...hey thanks for the (rolled up) newspaper for glenn...and even though you Commented on this (Sundays) Post, I would like to put you down for responding to Monday's Post as well...which mean....score!!* *ask me later or watch tomorrow's Post (nothing bad...just want to wait for all the results to come.) …hey thanks for the (rolled up) newspaper for glenn…and even though you Commented on this (Sundays) Post, I would like to put you down for responding to Monday’s Post as well…which mean….score!!*

*ask me later or watch tomorrow’s Post (nothing bad…just want to wait for all the results to come.)

]]> By: AKH http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/05/23/the-wakefield-doctrine-its-sunday-boys-aint-no-time-waste/#comment-1152 AKH Mon, 24 May 2010 20:28:41 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=2888#comment-1152 Refering to my previous comment asking "where do sayings come from?" - thanks for clarifying (floundering). Keep it up! (Hmm... where did that come from? Lots of possibilites. No Glenn, I don't think that was the original intended metaphor.) Refering to my previous comment asking “where do sayings come from?” – thanks for clarifying (floundering). Keep it up! (Hmm… where did that come from? Lots of possibilites. No Glenn, I don’t think that was the original intended metaphor.)

]]> By: Glenn Miller http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/05/23/the-wakefield-doctrine-its-sunday-boys-aint-no-time-waste/#comment-1141 Glenn Miller Mon, 24 May 2010 04:44:50 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=2888#comment-1141 Skipper and Gillian. The skipper finally went straight? Got his self a real live girl? Or is Gillian just a beard? The Skipper--such a homo! When they got to that island, Gilligan could shit in a thimble. After three years, he couldn't shit in a bathtub. Skipper and Gillian. The skipper finally went straight? Got his self a real live girl? Or is Gillian just a beard? The Skipper–such a homo! When they got to that island, Gilligan could shit in a thimble. After three years, he couldn’t shit in a bathtub.

]]> By: clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/05/23/the-wakefield-doctrine-its-sunday-boys-aint-no-time-waste/#comment-1136 clarkscottroger Mon, 24 May 2010 00:49:33 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=2888#comment-1136 ...yeah thanks...but here is the question: Was Martin Luther a <em><strong>scott</strong></em> or a <strong><em>roger</em></strong>? First impulse is to go with (a) <strong><em>roger</em></strong>, mostly on the basis and nature of his work, religious guys tend to be <em><strong>rogers</strong></em>, except the paedaphiles...no need to even wonder...now those are <em><strong>scotts</strong></em>... but the way that a <em><strong>roger</strong></em> works with a <em><strong>clark</strong></em> is distinctly different from the way the <em><strong>scott</strong></em> works with a <em><strong>clark</strong></em>. ...in keeping with their natures, <em><strong>scotts</strong></em> simply take what a <em><strong>clark</strong></em> says/suggests/thinks to do and does it on '11', not the slightest thought of attribution...(and those poor fucking <em><strong>clarks</strong></em> think that thats alright...) But a <em><strong>roger</strong></em> with a <em><strong>clark</strong></em> in the background something different...actually something little examined...do I hear Post? So I gots to go with Martin being a good ol <em><strong>scott</strong></em>... …yeah thanks…but here is the question:
Was Martin Luther a scott or a roger?
First impulse is to go with (a) roger, mostly on the basis and nature of his work, religious guys tend to be rogers, except the paedaphiles…no need to even wonder…now those are scotts… but the way that a roger works with a clark is distinctly different from the way the scott works with a clark.
…in keeping with their natures, scotts simply take what a clark says/suggests/thinks to do and does it on ’11′, not the slightest thought of attribution…(and those poor fucking clarks think that thats alright…)
But a roger with a clark in the background something different…actually something little examined…do I hear Post?
So I gots to go with Martin being a good ol scott…

]]> By: Roger (The) http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/05/23/the-wakefield-doctrine-its-sunday-boys-aint-no-time-waste/#comment-1134 Roger (The) Sun, 23 May 2010 22:55:13 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=2888#comment-1134 Nice one, dude. But, the " never has worked, never will work" part... not necessarily. I t just did work; a Clark uncovers and justifies another Clark, informs the masses, and drives the point home nicely. We've been told. Nice one, dude. But, the ” never has worked, never will work” part… not necessarily. I t just did work; a Clark uncovers and justifies another Clark, informs the masses, and drives the point home nicely. We’ve been told.

]]>