<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ready as this audience that’s coming here to dream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/02/02/the-wakefield-doctrine-ready-as-this-audience-thats-coming-here-to-dream-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/02/02/the-wakefield-doctrine-ready-as-this-audience-thats-coming-here-to-dream-2/</link>
	<description>(the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:33:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/02/02/the-wakefield-doctrine-ready-as-this-audience-thats-coming-here-to-dream-2/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1543#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Always fucking with me, Invisible One.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always fucking with me, Invisible One.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Downspring #1</title>
		<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/02/02/the-wakefield-doctrine-ready-as-this-audience-thats-coming-here-to-dream-2/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Downspring #1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1543#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Now who said anything about controlling a scott? That would imply an accepted position of dominance(by the scott).
Without getting into the finer points, it is correct to say the answer on how to deal with scotts lies in the withholding of reaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now who said anything about controlling a scott? That would imply an accepted position of dominance(by the scott).<br />
Without getting into the finer points, it is correct to say the answer on how to deal with scotts lies in the withholding of reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark</title>
		<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/02/02/the-wakefield-doctrine-ready-as-this-audience-thats-coming-here-to-dream-2/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1543#comment-242</guid>
		<description>oo! oo! (Horshack from &#039;Welcome Back Kotter&#039;) I know this one!

Control a &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;scott&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;? you have got to be kidding, how simple is that?
But, for Readers new to the &lt;strong&gt;Doctrine&lt;/strong&gt; the easiest most useful answer is to say, &quot;Watch Cesar&quot; better yet, watch this clip! (you have to sit through a 12 second commercial tho, you can do it Glenn, think about biting baseball players.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6ru7QLEYD4

(Not sure if this link will come through, if not &#039;blue&#039; then copy/paste it into your address bar)

Anyway. See what Cesar did with the &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;scottian&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; doggie?  He established the quiet first, not responding the barking threats.

Q: What do all &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;scotts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; want?
A: A reaction.

Plug for upcoming Post:  Glenn lecturing the &lt;strong&gt;Wakefield Doctrine&lt;/strong&gt; class (at Millard Fillmore High) on the topic of &#039;Leadership and &lt;strong&gt;the Wakefield Doctrine&#039;&lt;/strong&gt;.  Not to be missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oo! oo! (Horshack from &#8216;Welcome Back Kotter&#8217;) I know this one!</p>
<p>Control a <em><strong>scott</strong></em>? you have got to be kidding, how simple is that?<br />
But, for Readers new to the <strong>Doctrine</strong> the easiest most useful answer is to say, &#8220;Watch Cesar&#8221; better yet, watch this clip! (you have to sit through a 12 second commercial tho, you can do it Glenn, think about biting baseball players.)</p>
<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/02/02/the-wakefield-doctrine-ready-as-this-audience-thats-coming-here-to-dream-2/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/f6ru7QLEYD4/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
<p>(Not sure if this link will come through, if not &#8216;blue&#8217; then copy/paste it into your address bar)</p>
<p>Anyway. See what Cesar did with the <em><strong>scottian</strong></em> doggie?  He established the quiet first, not responding the barking threats.</p>
<p>Q: What do all <em><strong>scotts</strong></em> want?<br />
A: A reaction.</p>
<p>Plug for upcoming Post:  Glenn lecturing the <strong>Wakefield Doctrine</strong> class (at Millard Fillmore High) on the topic of &#8216;Leadership and <strong>the Wakefield Doctrine&#8217;</strong>.  Not to be missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Downspring #1</title>
		<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/02/02/the-wakefield-doctrine-ready-as-this-audience-thats-coming-here-to-dream-2/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Downspring #1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1543#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Thank you. And very scottian of you to &quot;challenge&quot; me. You know very well what position but we&#039;ll let that be our little secret.
To answer Clarkscottroger&#039;s non-question, I would say that scotts &quot;rage&quot; instinctively as part of a self survival, self protection mechanism.(they also rant extremely well) The need/urge to dominate/conquer is a by product of that mechanism. &quot;Who they are seeing&quot; is not overly important. Everyone is considered prey. Scotts thrive on energy. It&#039;s nothing personal.
My method(s) aside, how does a clark, roger or lesser scott avoid ceding power to a scott?
(Perhaps I shall write &quot;another one&quot; but Glenn! What do you say! That&#039;s right. &quot;Please&quot;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. And very scottian of you to &#8220;challenge&#8221; me. You know very well what position but we&#8217;ll let that be our little secret.<br />
To answer Clarkscottroger&#8217;s non-question, I would say that scotts &#8220;rage&#8221; instinctively as part of a self survival, self protection mechanism.(they also rant extremely well) The need/urge to dominate/conquer is a by product of that mechanism. &#8220;Who they are seeing&#8221; is not overly important. Everyone is considered prey. Scotts thrive on energy. It&#8217;s nothing personal.<br />
My method(s) aside, how does a clark, roger or lesser scott avoid ceding power to a scott?<br />
(Perhaps I shall write &#8220;another one&#8221; but Glenn! What do you say! That&#8217;s right. &#8220;Please&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarkscottroger</title>
		<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/02/02/the-wakefield-doctrine-ready-as-this-audience-thats-coming-here-to-dream-2/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>clarkscottroger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1543#comment-240</guid>
		<description>...As the level of discourse shoots heaven-ward...this just in from the scottian corral.

the question is not: why do the scotts rage, the question is &#039;who are they &#039;seeing&#039; as they speak&#039;?... of course, maybe there is no one there (for the scott)...Bella (our dog) will not only bark at the slightest noise coming from the woods in the backyard, she will charge into the woods, barking...preparing for? fight/conflict/unknown foes  or the echo of the noise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;As the level of discourse shoots heaven-ward&#8230;this just in from the scottian corral.</p>
<p>the question is not: why do the scotts rage, the question is &#8216;who are they &#8216;seeing&#8217; as they speak&#8217;?&#8230; of course, maybe there is no one there (for the scott)&#8230;Bella (our dog) will not only bark at the slightest noise coming from the woods in the backyard, she will charge into the woods, barking&#8230;preparing for? fight/conflict/unknown foes  or the echo of the noise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/02/02/the-wakefield-doctrine-ready-as-this-audience-thats-coming-here-to-dream-2/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1543#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Nice one, invisible woman. Well done. Especially liked the parts about...ME! But enough about me. What about you? What do YOU think of me? What &quot;position&quot; would you like me to assume? Anything for you, Baby. You should write another one. All I can say is....&quot;FUCK!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one, invisible woman. Well done. Especially liked the parts about&#8230;ME! But enough about me. What about you? What do YOU think of me? What &#8220;position&#8221; would you like me to assume? Anything for you, Baby. You should write another one. All I can say is&#8230;.&#8221;FUCK!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

