<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He Shoots…He Scores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/01/26/the-wakefield-doctrine-he-shoots-he-scores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/01/26/the-wakefield-doctrine-he-shoots-he-scores/</link>
	<description>(the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:56:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKH</title>
		<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/01/26/the-wakefield-doctrine-he-shoots-he-scores/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>AKH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1461#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Way to go Glenn - you hit it out of the park! Couldn&#039;t have been put better. Very refreshing to read and relate to a fellow scottian perspective. Grinned the entire time:) If this doesn&#039;t exemplify the scottian point of view to the readers I don&#039;t know what will.
Just too much fun to read - had to re-read several times purely for the enjoyment of it. Thanks.
(No devil&#039;s advocate here. But would sure love to see someone give it a shot.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go Glenn &#8211; you hit it out of the park! Couldn&#8217;t have been put better. Very refreshing to read and relate to a fellow scottian perspective. Grinned the entire time:) If this doesn&#8217;t exemplify the scottian point of view to the readers I don&#8217;t know what will.<br />
Just too much fun to read &#8211; had to re-read several times purely for the enjoyment of it. Thanks.<br />
(No devil&#8217;s advocate here. But would sure love to see someone give it a shot.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKH</title>
		<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/01/26/the-wakefield-doctrine-he-shoots-he-scores/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>AKH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1461#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Way to go Glenn - you hit it out of the park! Couldn&#039;t have been put better. Very refreshing to read and relate to a fellow scottian perspective. Grinned the entire time:) If this doesn&#039;t exemplify the scottian point of view to the readers I don&#039;t know what will.
Just too much fun to read - had to re-read several times purely for the enjoyment of it. Thanks.
(No devil&#039;s advocate here. But would sure love to see someone give it a shot.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go Glenn &#8211; you hit it out of the park! Couldn&#8217;t have been put better. Very refreshing to read and relate to a fellow scottian perspective. Grinned the entire time:) If this doesn&#8217;t exemplify the scottian point of view to the readers I don&#8217;t know what will.<br />
Just too much fun to read &#8211; had to re-read several times purely for the enjoyment of it. Thanks.<br />
(No devil&#8217;s advocate here. But would sure love to see someone give it a shot.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the clark</title>
		<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/01/26/the-wakefield-doctrine-he-shoots-he-scores/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>the clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1461#comment-235</guid>
		<description>(to qualify for the next separate Reply) I will complete the sentence contained in ON THE NEXT POST

...shall be the whole of the law.

binyons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(to qualify for the next separate Reply) I will complete the sentence contained in ON THE NEXT POST</p>
<p>&#8230;shall be the whole of the law.</p>
<p>binyons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the clark</title>
		<link>http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2010/01/26/the-wakefield-doctrine-he-shoots-he-scores/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>the clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1461#comment-237</guid>
		<description>(to qualify for the next separate Reply) I will complete the sentence contained in ON THE NEXT POST

...shall be the whole of the law.

binyons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(to qualify for the next separate Reply) I will complete the sentence contained in ON THE NEXT POST</p>
<p>&#8230;shall be the whole of the law.</p>
<p>binyons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: wakefielddoctrine.com @ 2012-05-19 19:33:37 -->
