Comments on: oh, man…what is it now? http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2009/12/27/the-wakefield-doctrine-oh-man-what-is-it-now/ (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:39:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2009/12/27/the-wakefield-doctrine-oh-man-what-is-it-now/#comment-169 clarkscottroger Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:33:34 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1247#comment-169 Alright!!!clarks... Now if there are any rogers or scotts reading this (in what remains of the day) would you be so kind as to translate the prior message into a language commonly used on the planet earth, it would be appreciated. (come on Slovenians, I know yours would be a welcome viewpoint. The Doctrine is culture and gender neutral, tell us how the above sounds to those from away). Alright!!!clarks…

Now if there are any rogers or scotts reading this (in what remains of the day) would you be so kind as to translate the prior message into a language commonly used on the planet earth, it would be appreciated.

(come on Slovenians, I know yours would be a welcome viewpoint. The Doctrine is culture and gender neutral, tell us how the above sounds to those from away).

]]> By: clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2009/12/27/the-wakefield-doctrine-oh-man-what-is-it-now/#comment-179 clarkscottroger Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:33:34 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1247#comment-179 Alright!!!clarks... Now if there are any rogers or scotts reading this (in what remains of the day) would you be so kind as to translate the prior message into a language commonly used on the planet earth, it would be appreciated. (come on Slovenians, I know yours would be a welcome viewpoint. The Doctrine is culture and gender neutral, tell us how the above sounds to those from away). Alright!!!clarks…

Now if there are any rogers or scotts reading this (in what remains of the day) would you be so kind as to translate the prior message into a language commonly used on the planet earth, it would be appreciated.

(come on Slovenians, I know yours would be a welcome viewpoint. The Doctrine is culture and gender neutral, tell us how the above sounds to those from away).

]]> By: Downspring#1 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2009/12/27/the-wakefield-doctrine-oh-man-what-is-it-now/#comment-168 Downspring#1 Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:53:33 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1247#comment-168 This Post was enjoyable in a sideways sort of way. Anyone who may think they know what that means, I say "welcome fellow clark". The theory of clarks, scotts and rogers, is an enjoyable way to remind myself of myself. To occaisionally step outside myself, turn off the volume, hit replay and watch the film that is my life. To remember that evolution is key and awareness of others and their particular "world view" (and subsequent behavior), whether it be scottian or rogerian, is an integral component in that evolution. This Post was enjoyable in a sideways sort of way. Anyone who may think they know what that means, I say “welcome fellow clark”.
The theory of clarks, scotts and rogers, is an enjoyable way to remind myself of myself. To occaisionally step outside myself, turn off the volume, hit replay and watch the film that is my life. To remember that evolution is key and awareness of others and their particular “world view” (and subsequent behavior), whether it be scottian or rogerian, is an integral component in that evolution.

]]> By: Downspring#1 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2009/12/27/the-wakefield-doctrine-oh-man-what-is-it-now/#comment-178 Downspring#1 Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:53:33 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1247#comment-178 This Post was enjoyable in a sideways sort of way. Anyone who may think they know what that means, I say "welcome fellow clark". The theory of clarks, scotts and rogers, is an enjoyable way to remind myself of myself. To occaisionally step outside myself, turn off the volume, hit replay and watch the film that is my life. To remember that evolution is key and awareness of others and their particular "world view" (and subsequent behavior), whether it be scottian or rogerian, is an integral component in that evolution. This Post was enjoyable in a sideways sort of way. Anyone who may think they know what that means, I say “welcome fellow clark”.
The theory of clarks, scotts and rogers, is an enjoyable way to remind myself of myself. To occaisionally step outside myself, turn off the volume, hit replay and watch the film that is my life. To remember that evolution is key and awareness of others and their particular “world view” (and subsequent behavior), whether it be scottian or rogerian, is an integral component in that evolution.

]]> By: Downspring#1 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2009/12/27/the-wakefield-doctrine-oh-man-what-is-it-now/#comment-167 Downspring#1 Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:10:58 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1247#comment-167 You go Glenn! You Headmaster of the School of Fuck. You are astute in the identification of the rogerian concept of "fairness". All the children screaming on the playground "hey, that's not fair!" were indeed little rogers. Payback is a bitch, isn't it? You go Glenn! You Headmaster of the School of Fuck.
You are astute in the identification of the rogerian concept of “fairness”. All the children screaming on the playground “hey, that’s not fair!” were indeed little rogers.
Payback is a bitch, isn’t it?

]]> By: Downspring#1 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2009/12/27/the-wakefield-doctrine-oh-man-what-is-it-now/#comment-177 Downspring#1 Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:10:58 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1247#comment-177 You go Glenn! You Headmaster of the School of Fuck. You are astute in the identification of the rogerian concept of "fairness". All the children screaming on the playground "hey, that's not fair!" were indeed little rogers. Payback is a bitch, isn't it? You go Glenn! You Headmaster of the School of Fuck.
You are astute in the identification of the rogerian concept of “fairness”. All the children screaming on the playground “hey, that’s not fair!” were indeed little rogers.
Payback is a bitch, isn’t it?

]]> By: Glenn http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2009/12/27/the-wakefield-doctrine-oh-man-what-is-it-now/#comment-166 Glenn Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:25:10 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1247#comment-166 I have an f-word for you. "Fair" Rogers LOVE that word. Rogers actually believe there is a thing called objective fairness. "Ha" I say--and hasten to add, "Ha". Rogers are always trying to get people to be "fair" with them. What a crock! Fairness is the most subjective concept. Rogers almost always feel that people are not fair to them. And therefore Rogers feel perfectly justified in judging and condemning everyone at least some of the time--maybe all of the time. Rogers can be such infants in the real world. Their rage at the "unfairness" they encounter justifies their "unfair" dehumanizing of others. Again I point out that as a culture, we have become alright with the idea of torturing others--especially others who are different from us--religiously, racially, culturally... This is the inherent evil in the rogerian viewpoint. Their take on torture is that the tortured must be a "bad" person--therefore, a person who has no right to not be tortured. Therefore--not a person-- because they are "unfair". Rogers may be the organizers and keepers of order in the world, which is a strength, but, within that very strength is the capacity for extreme evil--disguised of course as something that is needed and proper. Then they go get other rogers to agree with them. Roger DO run the world--and that is why the world is so perilous and cruel. To a roger, cruelty against a bad person--does not count. It is not really cruelty. Herd animals who cannot think independently and rationally are dangerous. Herds stampede sometimes. Mindlessly. Like the way the rogers in power in this world are all so eager to see "bad" people punished. The herd gone wild. I used to think that as a nation we would one day look back on this period with shame. But now I know that will not happen. As the herd continues to stampede, the rogers in charge will become more cruel and vindictive--and, the world will be a more orderly place--but a more dangerous place as well. Rogers know no shame. Fuck. I have an f-word for you. “Fair” Rogers LOVE that word. Rogers actually believe there is a thing called objective fairness. “Ha” I say–and hasten to add, “Ha”. Rogers are always trying to get people to be “fair” with them. What a crock! Fairness is the most subjective concept. Rogers almost always feel that people are not fair to them. And therefore Rogers feel perfectly justified in judging and condemning everyone at least some of the time–maybe all of the time. Rogers can be such infants in the real world. Their rage at the “unfairness” they encounter justifies their “unfair” dehumanizing of others. Again I point out that as a culture, we have become alright with the idea of torturing others–especially others who are different from us–religiously, racially, culturally… This is the inherent evil in the rogerian viewpoint. Their take on torture is that the tortured must be a “bad” person–therefore, a person who has no right to not be tortured. Therefore–not a person– because they are “unfair”. Rogers may be the organizers and keepers of order in the world, which is a strength, but, within that very strength is the capacity for extreme evil–disguised of course as something that is needed and proper. Then they go get other rogers to agree with them. Roger DO run the world–and that is why the world is so perilous and cruel. To a roger, cruelty against a bad person–does not count. It is not really cruelty. Herd animals who cannot think independently and rationally are dangerous. Herds stampede sometimes. Mindlessly. Like the way the rogers in power in this world are all so eager to see “bad” people punished. The herd gone wild. I used to think that as a nation we would one day look back on this period with shame. But now I know that will not happen. As the herd continues to stampede, the rogers in charge will become more cruel and vindictive–and, the world will be a more orderly place–but a more dangerous place as well. Rogers know no shame. Fuck.

]]> By: Glenn http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2009/12/27/the-wakefield-doctrine-oh-man-what-is-it-now/#comment-176 Glenn Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:25:10 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1247#comment-176 I have an f-word for you. "Fair" Rogers LOVE that word. Rogers actually believe there is a thing called objective fairness. "Ha" I say--and hasten to add, "Ha". Rogers are always trying to get people to be "fair" with them. What a crock! Fairness is the most subjective concept. Rogers almost always feel that people are not fair to them. And therefore Rogers feel perfectly justified in judging and condemning everyone at least some of the time--maybe all of the time. Rogers can be such infants in the real world. Their rage at the "unfairness" they encounter justifies their "unfair" dehumanizing of others. Again I point out that as a culture, we have become alright with the idea of torturing others--especially others who are different from us--religiously, racially, culturally... This is the inherent evil in the rogerian viewpoint. Their take on torture is that the tortured must be a "bad" person--therefore, a person who has no right to not be tortured. Therefore--not a person-- because they are "unfair". Rogers may be the organizers and keepers of order in the world, which is a strength, but, within that very strength is the capacity for extreme evil--disguised of course as something that is needed and proper. Then they go get other rogers to agree with them. Roger DO run the world--and that is why the world is so perilous and cruel. To a roger, cruelty against a bad person--does not count. It is not really cruelty. Herd animals who cannot think independently and rationally are dangerous. Herds stampede sometimes. Mindlessly. Like the way the rogers in power in this world are all so eager to see "bad" people punished. The herd gone wild. I used to think that as a nation we would one day look back on this period with shame. But now I know that will not happen. As the herd continues to stampede, the rogers in charge will become more cruel and vindictive--and, the world will be a more orderly place--but a more dangerous place as well. Rogers know no shame. Fuck. I have an f-word for you. “Fair” Rogers LOVE that word. Rogers actually believe there is a thing called objective fairness. “Ha” I say–and hasten to add, “Ha”. Rogers are always trying to get people to be “fair” with them. What a crock! Fairness is the most subjective concept. Rogers almost always feel that people are not fair to them. And therefore Rogers feel perfectly justified in judging and condemning everyone at least some of the time–maybe all of the time. Rogers can be such infants in the real world. Their rage at the “unfairness” they encounter justifies their “unfair” dehumanizing of others. Again I point out that as a culture, we have become alright with the idea of torturing others–especially others who are different from us–religiously, racially, culturally… This is the inherent evil in the rogerian viewpoint. Their take on torture is that the tortured must be a “bad” person–therefore, a person who has no right to not be tortured. Therefore–not a person– because they are “unfair”. Rogers may be the organizers and keepers of order in the world, which is a strength, but, within that very strength is the capacity for extreme evil–disguised of course as something that is needed and proper. Then they go get other rogers to agree with them. Roger DO run the world–and that is why the world is so perilous and cruel. To a roger, cruelty against a bad person–does not count. It is not really cruelty. Herd animals who cannot think independently and rationally are dangerous. Herds stampede sometimes. Mindlessly. Like the way the rogers in power in this world are all so eager to see “bad” people punished. The herd gone wild. I used to think that as a nation we would one day look back on this period with shame. But now I know that will not happen. As the herd continues to stampede, the rogers in charge will become more cruel and vindictive–and, the world will be a more orderly place–but a more dangerous place as well. Rogers know no shame. Fuck.

]]> By: clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2009/12/27/the-wakefield-doctrine-oh-man-what-is-it-now/#comment-165 clarkscottroger Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:52:18 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1247#comment-165 Appreciate the Replys. The Interview with the Progenitor roger will be out late today. (with the able support of AKH, I might add) Look forwards to any and all Reply/Comments, as it (the interview) is not 'about me' but it is an example of the worldview of the the rogerian people...your people Mjm. The idea behind trying this 'literary device' is to describe rogers (or scotts or clarks for that matters) by using their own words, reactions and responses. The Doctrine says that you should 'identify' with rogers responses far more than say Glenns' (used effectively the same questions and format). But keep in mind, the Doctrine says that we all posess the characteristics of all three, it is just a matter of a predominance///further complicated by the fact that if you can follow any of this, you are not a 'average' roger (or scott or clark) Stay tuned...be sure to venture your opinions (not that rogers have strong opinions) (I certainly would not be suggesting anything like that) (lol) Appreciate the Replys.

The Interview with the Progenitor roger will be out late today.

(with the able support of AKH, I might add)

Look forwards to any and all Reply/Comments, as it (the interview) is not ‘about me’ but it is an example of the worldview of the the rogerian people…your people Mjm.
The idea behind trying this ‘literary device’ is to describe rogers (or scotts or clarks for that matters) by using their own words, reactions and responses.
The Doctrine says that you should ‘identify’ with rogers responses far more than say Glenns’ (used effectively the same questions and format).

But keep in mind, the Doctrine says that we all posess the characteristics of all three, it is just a matter of a predominance///further complicated by the fact that if you can follow any of this, you are not a ‘average’ roger (or scott or clark)

Stay tuned…be sure to venture your opinions (not that rogers have strong opinions) (I certainly would not be suggesting anything like that) (lol)

]]> By: clarkscottroger http://wakefielddoctrine.com/2009/12/27/the-wakefield-doctrine-oh-man-what-is-it-now/#comment-175 clarkscottroger Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:52:18 +0000 http://wakefielddoctrine.com/?p=1247#comment-175 Appreciate the Replys. The Interview with the Progenitor roger will be out late today. (with the able support of AKH, I might add) Look forwards to any and all Reply/Comments, as it (the interview) is not 'about me' but it is an example of the worldview of the the rogerian people...your people Mjm. The idea behind trying this 'literary device' is to describe rogers (or scotts or clarks for that matters) by using their own words, reactions and responses. The Doctrine says that you should 'identify' with rogers responses far more than say Glenns' (used effectively the same questions and format). But keep in mind, the Doctrine says that we all posess the characteristics of all three, it is just a matter of a predominance///further complicated by the fact that if you can follow any of this, you are not a 'average' roger (or scott or clark) Stay tuned...be sure to venture your opinions (not that rogers have strong opinions) (I certainly would not be suggesting anything like that) (lol) Appreciate the Replys.

The Interview with the Progenitor roger will be out late today.

(with the able support of AKH, I might add)

Look forwards to any and all Reply/Comments, as it (the interview) is not ‘about me’ but it is an example of the worldview of the the rogerian people…your people Mjm.
The idea behind trying this ‘literary device’ is to describe rogers (or scotts or clarks for that matters) by using their own words, reactions and responses.
The Doctrine says that you should ‘identify’ with rogers responses far more than say Glenns’ (used effectively the same questions and format).

But keep in mind, the Doctrine says that we all posess the characteristics of all three, it is just a matter of a predominance///further complicated by the fact that if you can follow any of this, you are not a ‘average’ roger (or scott or clark)

Stay tuned…be sure to venture your opinions (not that rogers have strong opinions) (I certainly would not be suggesting anything like that) (lol)

]]>